# Evidence-based launch plan

Original prompt workbook by Jon Bishop. CC BY 4.0. Model execution has not been tested.

## Intended output

A launch checklist with dependencies and decision gates

## Input worksheet

Target audience, release scope, verified readiness checks, approved channels, dependencies, budget and owners

Fill in:
- Decision and owner:
- Source ID, URL/file, date and exact supporting observation:
- Relevant population, version or edition:
- Approved constraints and sensitive fields to remove:
- Missing evidence:

Use sanitized inputs. Follow your approved model provider and data handling rules. No external action is part of these prompts.

## Prompt 1

```text
Inspect the supplied inputs for evidence-based launch plan. Identify supported facts with their source IDs, contradictions and missing information. Do not infer missing product capabilities, numbers or customer evidence. Return an evidence ledger and blocking questions.

SUPPLIED INPUTS / PREVIOUS ARTIFACT:
[paste sanitized material here]
```

## Prompt 2

```text
Using only the evidence ledger and the original inputs, prepare a launch checklist with dependencies and decision gates. Label assumptions and unknowns. Keep dates, versions, cohort and edition boundaries attached to claims. Do not execute external actions.

SUPPLIED INPUTS / PREVIOUS ARTIFACT:
[paste sanitized material here]
```

## Prompt 3

```text
Review the draft against this criterion: Every task has an owner, dependencies are visible and external posting or spending requires its own authorization. List failed checks, unsupported claims and corrections. Return a corrected draft plus unresolved questions; do not claim checks were performed when the inputs do not contain their results.

SUPPLIED INPUTS / PREVIOUS ARTIFACT:
[paste sanitized material here]
```

## Worked example — fictional, manually authored

Input: Fictional: the signup route works, but the tutorial still contains an untested installation command.

Expected bounded output: Keep the tutorial verification as an unresolved gate; draft the channel plan without claiming launch readiness.

This illustrates the review standard; it is not a recorded model run.

## Human review

Every task has an owner, dependencies are visible and external posting or spending requires its own authorization.

Verify factual claims against the original evidence, check calculations or commands independently and record unresolved issues. Save the inputs, prompt version, model version and corrections if you run this workbook. Publication, sending, account changes and spending are separate decisions.