Customer behavior and adoption · Abstract-supported quantitative empirical study
Blockchain technology adoption and its impact on SME performance: insights for entrepreneurs and policymakers
J. Kumar, G. Rani, M. Rani, V. Rani (2024). Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy.
Plain-English take
Relative advantage, top-management support, competitive pressure and market dynamics significantly influenced blockchain adoption; the paper also tests adoption’s relationship with SME market and financial performance. For a founder, use this as a question to test in your own context, not a universal playbook.
How much weight to give this
3/5 Exploratory evidence; interpret cautiously
The 1–5 evidence-check score is a practical reading aid, not a formal peer review or a probability that a conclusion is true. It combines design strength (2 points), sample reporting (1), comparison/control clarity (1), and how much of the paper could be checked (1). Access affects how confidently this directory can assess a study, not the study's underlying quality. Blinding is reported separately because it is not relevant to every design.
Synthesis or analytical design addresses the question, but conclusions depend on included literature or model assumptions.
The reviewed source reports a sample or corpus size (407); size alone does not establish representativeness.
The comparison structure is limited or depends on the paper's model/context.
Only publisher abstract/metadata was retrieved; full methods and robustness could not be checked.
Double-blind? Blinding was not established from the captured source; it may not apply to this study design.
Research question
What the authors investigated
Which TOE/RBV factors predict blockchain adoption in SMEs, and how does adoption relate to market and financial performance?
Design
Survey of SMEs; TOE and resource-based-view framework; statistical analysis using PLS-SEM.
Sample and setting
407 SME responses from India.
Reported result
What the study found
Relative advantage, top-management support, competitive pressure and market dynamics significantly influenced blockchain adoption; the paper also tests adoption’s relationship with SME market and financial performance.
This is a paraphrase of the source. Check the original paper for definitions, estimates, statistical uncertainty and analysis details.
Scope and transfer
Limitations to keep in view
The accessible summary does not state detailed limitations; India-only cross-sectional self-report data limit causal and geographic inference.
Possible founder application
Treat this as evidence for the specific customer behavior and adoption question studied. Compare the setting and sample to your company before changing a growth decision; use a local experiment where the paper does not match your context.
Evidence access
Publisher abstract/metadata retrieved; full text not reviewed
Publisher DOI record and accessible article/abstract directly support the bibliographic record and the summary fields; editorial review remains appropriate for duplicate checking against the unseen 300-study library. Correction notices were not separately verified in this collection; consult the current publisher record before applying the findings.
If only an abstract or metadata was available, the profile is limited to claims supported there. A paper's paywall does not change its evidentiary status, but it limits what we can substantiate from accessible text.