Marketing strategy · Abstract-supported quantitative empirical study
Cybersecurity management: an empirical analysis of dynamic capabilities framework for enhancing cybersecurity intelligence
Information and Computer Security · 2025
Summary
“Doing” and “improving” dimensions were positively associated with cybersecurity intelligence; “enabling” and “managing” dimensions did not make significant contributions. For a founder, use this as a question to test in your own context, not a universal playbook.
For your marketing
Possible founder application
Treat this as evidence for the specific marketing capability and growth question studied. Compare the setting and sample to your company before changing a growth decision; use a local experiment where the paper does not match your context.
Reported result
What the study found
“Doing” and “improving” dimensions were positively associated with cybersecurity intelligence; “enabling” and “managing” dimensions did not make significant contributions.
Research question
What the authors investigated
Which dynamic capabilities contribute to organizational cybersecurity intelligence?
Design
Develops a dynamic-capabilities-in-cybersecurity framework and tests it with hierarchical regression.
Sample and setting
207 cybersecurity experts across diverse regions.
Scope and transfer
Limitations to keep in view
The accessible abstract does not state detailed limitations; expert self-report and cross-sectional regression design warrant editorial review.
Research sources
Publisher DOI record and accessible article/abstract directly support the bibliographic record and the summary fields; editorial review remains appropriate for duplicate checking against the unseen 300-study library. Correction notices were not separately verified in this collection; consult the current publisher record before applying the findings.