Referrals · Large-scale field dataset, preregistered lab experiments, and field experiment
Referral Contagion: Downstream Benefits of Customer Referrals
Journal of Marketing Research · 2024
Summary
Conditional on purchase activity, referred customers made 31%–57% more referrals than nonreferred customers in the field data.
For your marketing
Possible founder application
Track whether acquired customers later refer others and test simple lifecycle reminders. Evaluate incremental referred-customer value net of reward cost; avoid treating the reported lift as a forecast for a different product.
Reported result
What the study found
Conditional on purchase activity, referred customers made 31%–57% more referrals than nonreferred customers in the field data. In a field experiment, reminding customers they joined through a referral further raised their likelihood of referring by 21% according to the publisher abstract.
Research question
What the authors investigated
Do customers acquired through referrals themselves generate more downstream referrals, and can that behavior be increased?
Design
A large-scale customer field dataset was combined with preregistered laboratory experiments and a field experiment that reminded customers how they had joined.
Sample and setting
The publisher abstract reports a large-scale field dataset but no total sample size; the author-hosted manuscript describes data from 41.2 million customers, two preregistered lab experiments, and one field experiment.
Scope and transfer
Limitations to keep in view
The field relationships may depend on the partner firms and customer contexts; the reminder intervention is a specific treatment. Referral propensity is not evidence that a referral program is profitable after incentives and servicing costs.
Research sources
Journal of Marketing Research abstract plus author-hosted manuscript; sample detail comes from the manuscript, and the 21% result follows the publisher abstract.