Referrals · One field study and two laboratory studies
Reward Design for Customer Referral Programs: Reward–Product Congruence Effect and Gender Difference
Frontiers in Psychology · 2021
Summary
Across the reported studies, utilitarian rewards generated higher referral likelihood for utilitarian products, whereas hedonic rewards performed better for hedonic products.
For your marketing
Possible founder application
When offering referral incentives, test whether the reward feels aligned with the product and the referrer's motive. Measure actual invitations and resulting customer value; avoid using demographic stereotypes as a substitute for experimentation.
Reported result
What the study found
Across the reported studies, utilitarian rewards generated higher referral likelihood for utilitarian products, whereas hedonic rewards performed better for hedonic products. The paper also examines gender differences in this congruence pattern.
Research question
What the authors investigated
Does the fit between a referral reward and the product being recommended affect referral likelihood, and does the pattern differ by gender?
Design
One field study and two laboratory studies test referral responses to utilitarian versus hedonic products and congruent versus incongruent reward types.
Sample and setting
Field and laboratory settings involving product and reward evaluations. The accessible abstract does not give a combined sample size; the full text reports separate studies and samples.
Scope and transfer
Limitations to keep in view
The tested products and rewards are specific to the study settings, and the abstract does not establish whether the interaction generalizes to business software or B2B referrals. Referral likelihood is not the same as completed referrals or profitable acquisition.
Research sources
Peer-reviewed publisher abstract and open full text; the profile summarizes the stated design and central congruence result.