Skip to content
J·BJon BishopIndependent growth marketer

Prioritization · Source reviewed; not hands-on tested

RICE prioritization

Reach, impact, confidence and effort help compare proposed work.

When this is useful

You need a structured decision rather than a universal marketing formula.

Required inputs

Estimate reach for the same period; state the impact scale; record the evidence behind confidence; estimate person-time.

Worked example — fictional

Fictional: onboarding guidance reaches 100 accounts, impact 1, confidence 0.5, effort 2 person-months: score 25. A confidence change can reverse the ranking.

Original worksheet

Download our evidence worksheet; upstream diagrams and proprietary templates are not redistributed.

Put it to work

  1. Define the decision and gather the stated inputs.
  2. Apply the method while retaining uncertainty and contrary evidence.
  3. Choose a next observation and write the conditions for revisiting the decision.

Limits and tradeoffs

A score orders estimates; it does not demonstrate return or override dependencies.

Worksheet preview

# RICE prioritization: original decision worksheet

Attribution: Jon Bishop. CC BY 4.0. Framework source: https://www.intercom.com/blog/rice-simple-prioritization-for-product-managers/

This is an original worksheet, not a copy of the source artifact.

## Decision

What decision must this exercise inform? Who owns it? What evidence would change it?

## Inputs

Estimate reach for the same period; state the impact scale; record the evidence behind confidence; estimate person-time.

For each input, record: observation | source | date | affected population | confidence | unresolved question.

## Application

1. Define one concrete decision and comparison period.
2. Record evidence separately from estimates.
3. Apply the method and inspect the assumptions that drive the result.
4. State the next observation or test and its decision rule.

## Worked example — fictional

Fictional: onboarding guidance reaches 100 accounts, impact 1, confidence 0.5, effort 2 person-months: score 25. A confidence change can reverse the ranking.

## Limits

A score orders estimates; it does not demonstrate return or override dependencies.

## Output

Decision: ___
Evidence supporting it: ___
Contradictory or missing evidence: ___
Next action and owner: ___
Revisit when: ___
Prefer to write? Send Jon a message.