Cloud computing · Cross-sectional empirical survey study grounded in transaction-cost theory, the resource-based view, and the theory of planned behavior; the research model tests SaaS-adoption drivers across application types.
Drivers of SaaS-Adoption – An Empirical Study of Different Application Types
Business & Information Systems Engineering · 2009
Summary
Adoption patterns differed by application type. Social influence, pre-existing attitude toward SaaS adoption, adoption uncertainty, and strategic value were the strongest and most consistent drivers; firm size did not matter because large enterprises and SMEs had similar adoption rates.
For your marketing
Possible founder application
Use this study as a bounded example of drivers of saas-adoption – an empirical study of different application types; assess whether its population, intervention and outcome match your own decision.
Reported result
What the study found
Adoption patterns differed by application type. Social influence, pre-existing attitude toward SaaS adoption, adoption uncertainty, and strategic value were the strongest and most consistent drivers; firm size did not matter because large enterprises and SMEs had similar adoption rates.
Research question
What the authors investigated
What does drivers of saas-adoption – an empirical study of different application types show about customer decisions or business outcomes?
Design
Cross-sectional empirical survey study grounded in transaction-cost theory, the resource-based view, and the theory of planned behavior; the research model tests SaaS-adoption drivers across application types.
Sample and setting
Survey data from 297 firms in Germany, yielding 374 valid response items across different industries.
Scope and transfer
Limitations to keep in view
The evidence is a cross-sectional survey of German firms and measures adoption drivers rather than randomized growth interventions or longitudinal retention, limiting causal and geographic generalization. Full article methods and correction history were not independently reviewed.
Research sources
Publisher page directly retrieved; candidate metadata and reported result checked against that page. Full methods were not independently reviewed.