Pricing Services Subject to Congestion: Charge Per-Use Fees or Sell Subscriptions?

For your marketing

Possible founder application

Use as a pricing hypothesis: compare seat/usage subscriptions with metered pricing while stress-testing capacity and heavy-user economics; validate with controlled pilots because real SaaS marginal costs and network effects differ.

Reported result

What the study found

Subscription pricing can earn more revenue than per-use pricing even when congestion is costly; its relative appeal rises with high potential utilization, fixed capacity and sufficiently different heavy/light usage rates.

Research question

What the authors investigated

When do subscriptions outperform per-use fees for services with limited capacity and congestion?

Design

Analytical queueing/pricing model comparing per-use fees with subscriptions under congestion, consumer heterogeneity and fixed capacity.

Sample and setting

Theoretical service-pricing setting; no human or firm sample.

Scope and transfer

Limitations to keep in view

Model-based results depend on assumptions about congestion, demand, capacity and consumer information; not a causal field test and not SaaS-specific.

Research sources

Direct publisher scrape verified title/record and available text; Firecrawl source ID 01a1228e-1136-75fb-83d9-346fd599e015. Correction notices were not separately checked.