Retention · Large-scale randomized field experiment
The Perils of Proactive Churn Prevention Using Plan Recommendations: Evidence from a Field Experiment
Journal of Marketing Research · 2016
Summary
Churn over the following three months was 10% in the recommendation group versus 6% in the control group.
For your marketing
Possible founder application
Before prompting customers to downgrade or switch plans, run a controlled test and examine effects by usage pattern. A recommendation that improves price fit can still increase churn through salience or perceived value.
Reported result
What the study found
Churn over the following three months was 10% in the recommendation group versus 6% in the control group. Effects varied with pre-campaign usage patterns; customers with lower overage, lower variability and positive trends responded differently.
Research question
What the authors investigated
Can proactively recommending a lower-cost or better-fitting plan reduce churn, or can the recommendation make customers more likely to leave?
Design
A large-scale field experiment randomly offered some service customers plan recommendations and compared churn with a control group.
Sample and setting
Customers of a service provider with multiple usage plans; the paper examines how responses differ by prior overage, usage variability and usage trend.
Scope and transfer
Limitations to keep in view
A specific service plan and customer base; a proactive plan recommendation can have different meaning for SaaS users. The aggregate increase masks heterogeneity and is not a reason to avoid all plan guidance.
Research sources
Journal of Marketing Research abstract and author-hosted paper; the field experiment and 6% versus 10% churn figures are reported in the manuscript.