Skip to content
J·BJon BishopIndependent growth marketer

Advertising · Large-scale randomized advertising field experiment and statistical analysis

When Less Is More: Data and Power in Advertising Experiments

Marketing Science · 2017

Garrett A. Johnson, Randall A. Lewis, David H. Reiley

Summary

The paper's main point is that more granular data do not necessarily make advertising effects easier to estimate and examines tradeoffs between measurement precision and experimentation resources.

For your marketing

Possible founder application

Plan experiments around outcome variance and expected effect size. Large audiences alone do not guarantee useful estimates; choose an outcome and design that can detect a decision-relevant change.

Reported result

What the study found

The paper highlights that more granular data do not necessarily make advertising effects easier to estimate and examines tradeoffs between measurement precision and experimentation resources.

Research question

What the authors investigated

How do the amount and structure of available data affect the power and cost of online advertising experiments?

Design

The study uses a randomized field experiment involving approximately three million Yahoo! users and examines the relationship between data availability and experimental measurement of ad effects.

Sample and setting

Yahoo! advertising experiment at large scale; the publisher search result reports evidence that retailer ads increased sales by 3.6% in the studied campaign.

Scope and transfer

Limitations to keep in view

One platform and retailer campaign context; the 3.6% result should not be treated as a general ad-lift benchmark. The paper's title concerns statistical power and design, which require reading the methods before choosing an experiment size.

Research sources

INFORMS publisher metadata and publisher-indexed summary; details are labeled conservatively where the abstract preview is limited.

Prefer to write? Send Jon a message.