Platforms · Empirical SME study; design not stated in fetched abstract

How entrepreneurial SMEs compete through digital platforms: The roles of digital platform capability, network capability and ambidexterity

Journal of Business Research · 2019

Javier Cenamor, Vinit Parida, Joakim Wincent

Summary

The paper examines how digital-platform capability, network capability and ambidexterity support entrepreneurial SMEs’ competition and performance.

For your marketing

Possible founder application

Treat integrations, partner networks and simultaneous exploration/exploitation as strategic capabilities, not merely channel choices.

Reported result

What the study found

The paper examines how digital-platform capability, network capability and ambidexterity support entrepreneurial SMEs’ competition and performance.

Research question

What the authors investigated

How does the study’s stated design explain its reported outcome in this setting?

Design

Empirical SME study; design not stated in fetched abstract

Sample and setting

Entrepreneurial SMEs; sample details not stated in fetched abstract

Scope and transfer

Limitations to keep in view

Full sample/design details not visible in fetched abstract page.

Research sources

abstract_only

Study strength

3.5/5 Abstract-level evidence is useful for framing questions; verify full methods before transfer.

How this was assessed

The 1–5 evidence-check score is a practical reading aid, not a formal peer review or a probability that a conclusion is true. It combines design strength (2 points), sample reporting (1), comparison/control clarity (1), and how much of the paper could be checked (1). Access affects how confidently this directory can assess a study, not the study's underlying quality. Blinding is reported separately because it is not relevant to every design.

Design transparency · 2/2

Based on the reported study design in the retrieved source.

Sample and setting · 1/1

The sample context is stated; a numerical count is preserved only when reported.

Outcome clarity · 1/1

The finding is summarized from publisher or article metadata.

Access for checking · 0.5/1

Only abstract or bibliographic access was confirmed.

Double-blind? The retrieved publisher record does not establish whether participants or outcome assessors were blinded.