Buyer behavior · Quantitative survey

Shaping Digital Innovation Via Digital-related Capabilities

Information Systems Frontiers · 2020

authors not shown on fetched abstract page

Summary

Human, technical and innovation capabilities contributed to digital market offerings; human, collaboration and technical capabilities contributed to digital business processes.

For your marketing

Possible founder application

Audit whether the team has the people, technical base and innovation routines needed for both product and process digitalization.

Reported result

What the study found

Human, technical and innovation capabilities contributed to digital market offerings; human, collaboration and technical capabilities contributed to digital business processes.

Research question

What the authors investigated

How does the study’s stated design explain its reported outcome in this setting?

Design

Quantitative survey

Sample and setting

280 Finnish SMEs in service and manufacturing

Scope and transfer

Limitations to keep in view

Cross-sectional self-report survey in Finland; causal direction is not established.

Research sources

abstract_only

Study strength

3.5/5 Abstract-level evidence is useful for framing questions; verify full methods before transfer.

How this was assessed

The 1–5 evidence-check score is a practical reading aid, not a formal peer review or a probability that a conclusion is true. It combines design strength (2 points), sample reporting (1), comparison/control clarity (1), and how much of the paper could be checked (1). Access affects how confidently this directory can assess a study, not the study's underlying quality. Blinding is reported separately because it is not relevant to every design.

Design transparency · 2/2

Based on the reported study design in the retrieved source.

Sample and setting · 1/1

The sample context is stated; a numerical count is preserved only when reported.

Outcome clarity · 1/1

The finding is summarized from publisher or article metadata.

Access for checking · 0.5/1

Only abstract or bibliographic access was confirmed.

Double-blind? The retrieved publisher record does not establish whether participants or outcome assessors were blinded.

Read the paper