Buyer behavior
Study strength: 4.5/5
Journal of Consumer Research · 2010
For your marketing
Avoid blanket advice to remove pricing plans or features just to reduce option count. Define the decision task and test whether complexity, preference uncertainty or decision goals create friction for your own users.
Summary
The study found a mean effect size close to zero, with substantial variation across conditions.
Learn more →
Buyer behavior
Study strength: 3.5/5
Journal of Consumer Psychology · 2015
For your marketing
Use the moderators to form testable questions about pricing and product choice: Are plans meaningfully complex? Does the visitor know what they need? Is the decision goal clear? Validate with behavioral evidence from your own audience.
Summary
The useful point is four moderators that help explain when assortment size can have positive or negative effects: choice-set complexity, decision-task difficulty, preference uncertainty and decision goal.
Learn more →
Buyer behavior
Study strength: 4.0/5
Marketing Science · 2016
For your marketing
For product-led and sales-assisted motions, test whether messaging or an incentive changes adoption of a second channel or product path, and measure contribution rather than channel count alone.
Summary
The experiment tests whether campaign design can cause multichannel buying and more profitable customer behavior, distinguishing communication content from financial incentives.
Learn more →
Buyer behaviorContent marketingProduct adoption
Study strength: 3.5/5
Industrial Marketing Management · 2024
For your marketing
Map content to the reader's current task and test different sequences rather than enforcing one universal funnel. Measure meaningful downstream B2B outcomes along with engagement.
Summary
Content judged relevant to a particular customer-journey stage increased engagement with both the selling firm and its content.
Learn more →
Buyer behaviorPricing
Study strength: 3.5/5
Journal of Marketing Research · 2022
For your marketing
When studying a paid plan or membership, distinguish benefit-driven usage from behavioral effects of the upfront commitment. Segment responses and evaluate retention and margin alongside purchase volume.
Summary
Subscription increased customer purchases, with economically meaningful and persistent effects that varied across customers.
Learn more →
AdvertisingBuyer behavior
Study strength: 4.0/5
Journal of Marketing Research · 2015
For your marketing
Measure how campaigns affect more than the final conversion event, while preserving the experimental control that supports causal estimates. Check the paper's full results before mapping its model to a SaaS funnel.
Summary
The paper uses randomized exposure data to estimate how display advertising affects multiple purchase-funnel outcomes rather than relying only on last-click attribution.
Learn more →
Buyer behaviorSearch
Study strength: 2.5/5
Journal of Business Research · 2022
For your marketing
Evaluate organic-search investments over an appropriate time window and distinguish durable qualified demand from transient ranking or click changes. Consult the full paper before applying its model or effect estimates.
Summary
The paper treats keyword choice and marketing expenditure as having both short- and long-run performance implications, challenging evaluation based only on immediate traffic response.
Learn more →
Buyer behaviorSearch
Study strength: 4.5/5
Marketing Science · 2025
For your marketing
Useful for designing search suggestions and content discovery on a site or product. Test whether suggested paths help visitors find what they need without suppressing valuable self-directed exploration.
Summary
Trending keywords increased chance of buying by 10.4% and spending by 8.8% versus an empty search bar.
Learn more →
Buyer behaviorContent marketing
Study strength: 2.5/5
Industrial Marketing Management · 2022
For your marketing
An operational map for B2B content: understand buying jobs, build problem-framing and problem-solving assets, and distribute them when buyers need them. Treat the proposed performance relationships as hypotheses to test.
Summary
The authors organize the work into journey intelligence, a portfolio of valuable content, and timely sharing matched to buyer needs.
Learn more →
Buyer behavior
Study strength: 2.5/5
Industrial Marketing Management · 2023
For your marketing
A useful map for planning acquisition content and post-sale education together. Follow the buyer through deployment and reassessment rather than stopping the journey at the contract.
Summary
Defines B2B journeys as intertwined, goal-oriented paths through both purchase and use, involving multiple buying- and usage-center members, direct and indirect touchpoints, and relational context.
Learn more →
Buyer behavior
Study strength: 2.5/5
Journal of Business Research · 2023
For your marketing
A reminder to design digital touchpoints for the full B2B relationship, including customer use and service. Transfer cautiously because the studied offerings are large, complex industrial products.
Summary
The study identifies changes to digital touchpoints, customer and supplier roles, and the journey process.
Learn more →
Buyer behaviorReviews
Study strength: 3.5/5
Data and Information Management · 2024
For your marketing
A broad synthesis of review signals and trust factors. Use it to form hypotheses for SaaS proof and reputation pages, while measuring actual qualified conversion rather than intention alone.
Summary
All analyzed review antecedents were significantly related to purchase intention; review valence had the largest reported association (r = 0.563).
Learn more →
Buyer behaviorProduct adoptionWebsite design
Study strength: 2/5
Journal of Interactive Marketing · 2019
For your marketing
Use this paper as evidence about app adoption: the effect on purchasing of customers who have used a mobile website previously in the stated context; compare its population, treatment and outcome with your own decision.
Summary
App adopters have higher purchase incidence, purchase more frequently, and spend more per order than non-adopters. The app effect on order size is stronger for customers with a lower share of high-price-category spending and for less-loyal customers, consistent with reduced perceived financial risk and potentially improved loyalty.
Learn more →
Buyer behavior
Study strength: 2/5
Industrial Marketing Management · 2019
For your marketing
Use this paper as evidence about b2b relationships on the fast track: an empirical investigation into the outcomes of solution provision in the stated context; compare its population, treatment and outcome with your own decision.
Summary
Solution provision increased retention, sales volume, and cross-selling for recent customers (an accelerator role), while established customers did not show the same increases.
Learn more →
Buyer behavior
Study strength: 2/5
Management Science · 2008
For your marketing
Use this paper as evidence about customer lifetime value measurement in the stated context; compare its population, treatment and outcome with your own decision.
Summary
Jointly modeling purchase timing, amount, and defection predicts customer lifetime value and valuable-customer targeting better than extended NBD–Pareto, RFM, nested, and heuristic benchmarks. Longer interpurchase times predict larger purchase amounts and greater leaving risk; female and male customers show similar timing/risk patterns, while female customers spend less.
Learn more →
Buyer behaviorPlatformsProduct adoption
Study strength: 2/5
Technovation · 2025
For your marketing
Use this paper as evidence about stimulating data marketplace adoption in manufacturing: the impact of perceived control on willingness to share data in the stated context; compare its population, treatment and outcome with your own decision.
Summary
Perceived control significantly increased willingness to share; lower risk perceptions partially mediated the effect, whereas trust in data buyers did not mediate it.
Learn more →
Buyer behavior
Study strength: 2/5
Marketing Science · 2009
For your marketing
Use this paper as evidence about dynamic customer management and the value of one-to-one marketing in the stated context; compare its population, treatment and outcome with your own decision.
Summary
Customizing promotions increased simulated profits over uniform promotions. Free shipping was preferred for re-acquiring lapsed customers, while discount coupons worked best for active customers; temporal within-customer heterogeneity mattered more than cross-sectional heterogeneity.
Learn more →
Buyer behavior
Study strength: 2/5
PLoS ONE · 2024
For your marketing
Use this paper as evidence about evaluating the drivers of b2b performance: an empirical analysis based on alibaba in the stated context; compare its population, treatment and outcome with your own decision.
Summary
Service capability and logistics capability positively affected B2B performance; customer attention mediated these effects, including significant indirect effects for service capability (β=.148) and logistics capability (β=.084), both p<.01.
Learn more →
Buyer behavior
Study strength: 2/5
Marketing Science · 2019
For your marketing
Use this study as a bounded example related to mobile app introduction and online and offline purchases and product returns; evaluate whether its customers, intervention and outcome match your own context.
Summary
After launch, adopters bought 33% more frequently, 34% more items and spent 37% more, but returned 35% more frequently, 35% more items and 41% more in value; net monetary value was 36% higher.
Learn more →
Buyer behavior
Study strength: 2/5
Marketing Science · 1998
For your marketing
Use this study as a bounded example related to a dynamic model of the duration of the customer’s relationship with a continuous service provider: the role of satisfaction; evaluate whether its customers, intervention and outcome match your own context.
Summary
Pre-cancellation satisfaction is positively related to relationship duration. Experienced customers weight cumulative satisfaction more heavily; transactions and failures affect duration through satisfaction-dependent contrast/assimilation effects.
Learn more →
Buyer behavior
Study strength: 2/5
Journal of Marketing Research · 2011
For your marketing
Use this study as a bounded example related to how should consumers’ willingness to pay be measured? an empirical comparison of state-of-the-art approaches; evaluate whether its customers, intervention and outcome match your own context.
Summary
BDM and incentive-aligned CBC passed statistical and decision-oriented tests. Incentive-aligned settings produced greater price sensitivity and more 'none' choices; non-incentive methods can nevertheless yield useful demand curves and pricing decisions.
Learn more →
Buyer behaviorReferrals
Study strength: 2/5
Heliyon · 2024
For your marketing
Use this study as a bounded example of electronic word-of-mouth (ewom) on social networking sites (sns): roles of information credibility in shaping online purchase intention; assess whether its population, intervention and outcome match your own decision.
Summary
Information credibility significantly influenced information usefulness and information adoption. Usefulness shaped attitudes but did not directly affect purchase intention; a positive attitude did not necessarily produce information adoption. Information adoption was a critical determinant of online purchase intention.
Learn more →
Buyer behavior
Study strength: 4/5
Information Systems Research · 2022
For your marketing
Use to shape a locally controlled channel or message test; account for audience, timing and attribution limits before reallocating budget.
Summary
Personalized recommendations increased purchase propensity 12.4% and basket value 1.7%; effects were largely mediated by consideration-set changes, especially breadth.
Learn more →
Buyer behavior
Study strength: 2.5/5
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · 2020
For your marketing
Use as a behavioral mechanism or experiment-design reference, not a direct forecast for a SaaS funnel.
Summary
Finer-grained recommendation sets reduced response despite better products; effect was stronger for more engaged consumers.
Learn more →
Buyer behavior
Study strength: 4.5/5
MIS Quarterly · 2020
For your marketing
Use as a behavioral mechanism or experiment-design reference, not a direct forecast for a SaaS funnel.
Summary
Publisher abstract/search result reports causal evidence for both complementarity and cannibalization between offline and online targeting.
Learn more →
Buyer behavior
Study strength: 3.5/5
Journal of Marketing · 2021
For your marketing
Use as a behavioral mechanism or experiment-design reference, not a direct forecast for a SaaS funnel.
Summary
The paper uses causal online-test evidence to study how marketing information can be captured and used for growth.
Learn more →
Buyer behavior
Study strength: 2.5/5
Marketing Science · 2016
For your marketing
Use as a behavioral mechanism or experiment-design reference, not a direct forecast for a SaaS funnel.
Summary
Profiles were interpretable; internal-only data could be biased; search engines covered less activity but had higher data quality and could recover profiles; simulation showed targeting gains.
Learn more →
Buyer behavior
Study strength: 4/5
Management Science · 2024
For your marketing
Use as a behavioral mechanism or experiment-design reference, not a direct forecast for a SaaS funnel.
Summary
Seller Hub increased data-driven decision making and revenues 3.6%; more items transacted and service quality rose without average-price increases; over one-third of impact came from active monitoring.
Learn more →
Buyer behavior
Study strength: 2.5/5
Management Science · 2006
For your marketing
Use as a behavioral mechanism or experiment-design reference, not a direct forecast for a SaaS funnel.
Summary
The dynamic model received support in the field test, while results also identified opportunities for improvement over the model.
Learn more →
Buyer behavior
Study strength: 2.5/5
Journal of Interactive Marketing · 2009
For your marketing
Use as a behavioral mechanism or experiment-design reference, not a direct forecast for a SaaS funnel.
Summary
Customer satisfaction, marketing effort, cross-buying and multichannel purchasing were positively related to CLV; purchase frequency and monetary value were generally positive but had contradictory findings.
Learn more →
Buyer behavior
Study strength: 3/5
International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management · 2022
For your marketing
Use as a behavioral mechanism or experiment-design reference, not a direct forecast for a SaaS funnel.
Summary
Confidence benefits, special-treatment benefits and brand credibility positively affected satisfaction and commitment; brand credibility was most influential toward satisfaction, commitment and ultimately CLV. Functional and technical quality did not significantly affect satisfaction.
Learn more →
Buyer behaviorRetention
Study strength: 2.5/5
Journal of Consumer Marketing · 2007
For your marketing
Use to frame a lifecycle hypothesis and define customer-level outcomes; check whether the study's market and retention horizon resemble yours.
Summary
Membership is associated with differences in purchase behavior, providing evidence for evaluating loyalty-program retention/value claims.
Learn more →
Buyer behaviorContent marketing
Study strength: 3.5/5
Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · 2021
For your marketing
Use as a behavioral mechanism or experiment-design reference, not a direct forecast for a SaaS funnel.
Summary
The paper tests effects on perceived credibility and purchase intention, with personality matching as a moderator.
Learn more →
Buyer behaviorContent marketing
Study strength: 2.5/5
First Monday · 2021
For your marketing
Use to shape a locally controlled channel or message test; account for audience, timing and attribution limits before reallocating budget.
Summary
The study estimates relationships between perceived social-media marketing activities and online impulse buying.
Learn more →
Buyer behavior
Study strength: 2.5/5
Information · 2021
For your marketing
Use it as a behavioral mechanism or experiment-design reference, not a direct forecast for a SaaS funnel.
Summary
Live features are examined as antecedents of flow experience and social presence, which are linked to purchase intention.
Learn more →
Buyer behavior
Study strength: 3/5
Frontiers in Psychology · 2023
For your marketing
Use it as a behavioral mechanism or experiment-design reference, not a direct forecast for a SaaS funnel.
Summary
Trust in products and sellers during live-stream shopping positively correlates with purchase intention; the model tests affordances through S-O-R mechanisms.
Learn more →
Buyer behavior
Study strength: 3.5/5
Information Technology and Management · 2022
For your marketing
Use it as a behavioral mechanism or experiment-design reference, not a direct forecast for a SaaS funnel.
Summary
Perceived diagnosticity is tested as a driver of purchase intention, with streamer type, product type, and brand awareness moderating effects.
Learn more →
Buyer behavior
Study strength: 2.5/5
Information Systems Frontiers · 2021
For your marketing
Use it as a behavioral mechanism or experiment-design reference, not a direct forecast for a SaaS funnel.
Summary
The study tests how social commerce affects online community engagement, a growth-relevant behavioral outcome.
Learn more →
Buyer behavior
Study strength: 3.5/5
Journal of Service Research · 1998
For your marketing
Use it as a behavioral mechanism or experiment-design reference, not a direct forecast for a SaaS funnel.
Summary
The experiments show that failure/recovery outcomes depend on failure and recovery attributes and customer responses; recovery can improve evaluations, but superior recovery does not uniformly erase the damage of failure.
Learn more →
Buyer behavior
Study strength: 2.5/5
Journal of Retailing · 2002
For your marketing
Use it as a behavioral mechanism or experiment-design reference, not a direct forecast for a SaaS funnel.
Summary
Perceived justice affects satisfaction and behavioral intent following failure/recovery; satisfaction partially mediates effects of justice on word of mouth and intent.
Learn more →
Buyer behavior
Study strength: 3.5/5
International Journal of Service Industry Management · 2007
For your marketing
Use it as a behavioral mechanism or experiment-design reference, not a direct forecast for a SaaS funnel.
Summary
The study tests how perceived justice shapes evaluations of consumption experiences, extending complaint/service-recovery justice logic to broader service encounters.
Learn more →
Buyer behavior
Study strength: 4/5
Information Systems Research · 2023
For your marketing
Use it as a behavioral mechanism or experiment-design reference, not a direct forecast for a SaaS funnel.
Summary
High-type men were more likely to verify, while medium-type women were most likely; verified users received more contacts from higher-type users, became more proactive, and voluntary verification facilitated desirable matching outcomes.
Learn more →
Buyer behavior
Study strength: 2.5/5
MIS Quarterly · 2003
For your marketing
Use it as a behavioral mechanism or experiment-design reference, not a direct forecast for a SaaS funnel.
Summary
Trust, perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use jointly explained intended online-shopping behavior; trust complemented TAM.
Learn more →
Buyer behavior
Study strength: 2.5/5
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · 2005
For your marketing
Use it as a behavioral mechanism or experiment-design reference, not a direct forecast for a SaaS funnel.
Summary
The four-service empirical results supported motivational influences on intention; the relative importance of antecedents differed across services.
Learn more →
Buyer behavior
Study strength: 3/5
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · 2009
For your marketing
Use it as a behavioral mechanism or experiment-design reference, not a direct forecast for a SaaS funnel.
Summary
Naive methods overestimate peer influence by 300–700%; homophily explains more than 50% of perceived contagion in the analyzed adoption network.
Learn more →
Buyer behavior
Study strength: 3/5
Industrial Marketing Management · 2020
For your marketing
Use it as a B2B mechanism or sales-process design reference. Validate the relationship in your deal size, buying committee and sales cycle.
Summary
Customization and loyalty to the account manager are salient drivers of purchase engagement. Engagement predicts consideration-set size, dependence and willingness to pay a premium; dependence mediates effects on consideration-set size and premium willingness to pay.
Learn more →
Buyer behavior
Study strength: 2.5/5
Decision Support Systems · 2008
For your marketing
Use it as a product, platform or behavior mechanism reference rather than a direct forecast for a SaaS funnel.
Summary
Trust and perceived risk strongly affected purchasing decisions. Disposition to trust, reputation, privacy concerns, security concerns, website information quality, and company reputation strongly affected trust; a third-party seal did not strongly influence trust.
Learn more →
Buyer behavior
Study strength: 3.5/5
Decision Support Systems · 2012
For your marketing
Use it as a product, platform or behavior mechanism reference rather than a direct forecast for a SaaS funnel.
Summary
For Malaysian consumers, age, trust, cost, social influence, and variety of services predicted adoption decisions; for Chinese consumers, trust, cost, and social influence predicted adoption. The publisher highlights that traditional TAM variables alone were unable to predict m-commerce adoption and that culture mattered.
Learn more →
Buyer behavior
Study strength: 3.5/5
Marketing Science · 2011
For your marketing
Use it as a product, platform or behavior mechanism reference rather than a direct forecast for a SaaS funnel.
Summary
The study found extensive cross-channel effects, direct effects on early and later funnel stages, and substantially higher profit impact for online customer-initiated contacts than offline firm-initiated contacts. A budget-shifting field experiment produced net profit increases 14 times larger than the status-quo allocation.
Learn more →
Buyer behavior
Study strength: 2.5/5
Management Science · 1969
For your marketing
Use it as a product, platform or behavior mechanism reference rather than a direct forecast for a SaaS funnel.
Summary
The model produced good predictions of the sales peak and its timing when applied to historical data, and provided a long-range color-television sales forecast.
Learn more →
Buyer behavior
Study strength: 3/5
MIS Quarterly · 2012
For your marketing
Use it as a product, platform or behavior mechanism reference rather than a direct forecast for a SaaS funnel.
Summary
Adding hedonic motivation, price value, and habit to UTAUT substantially increased explained variance: behavioral intention from 56% to 74% and technology use from 40% to 52%; age, gender, and experience were modeled as moderators.
Learn more →
Buyer behaviorReviews
Study strength: 2.5/5
Information Systems Research · 2021
For your marketing
Use it as a product, platform or behavior mechanism reference rather than a direct forecast for a SaaS funnel.
Summary
Mean ratings of substitutive products negatively affect focal-product purchase while ratings of complementary products have a positive effect; spillovers are stronger on mobile, across different brands for substitutive products, among less experienced consumers, and when rating variance is lower.
Learn more →
Buyer behavior
Study strength: 4/5
Journal of Marketing · 2017
For your marketing
Use it as a product, platform or behavior mechanism reference rather than a direct forecast for a SaaS funnel.
Summary
App adoption increased the manufacturer's annual sales revenue by 19.11%–22.79%; return on engagement remained positive after development costs, and was higher when buyers created more projects in the app.
Learn more →
Buyer behavior
Study strength: 2.5/5
Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing · 2024
For your marketing
Treat this as evidence for the specific b2b growth and sales question studied. Compare the setting and sample to your company before changing a growth decision; use a local experiment where the paper does not match your context.
Summary
Collaboration and exchange among buying-center members are more effective than competition/power struggles. Virtual/hybrid relations require greater intra-group cooperation; diverse backgrounds and collaboration support flexibility and performance. Technology increases certainty and automation but can create overload and biases, requiring analytical ability and clear decision responsibility. For a founder, use this as a question to test in your own context, not a universal playbook.
Learn more →
Buyer behaviorRetention
Study strength: 3.5/5
Telematics and Informatics Reports · 2024
For your marketing
Treat this as evidence for the specific pricing and monetization question studied. Compare the setting and sample to your company before changing a growth decision; use a local experiment where the paper does not match your context.
Summary
Perceived usefulness, ease of use, and enjoyment positively related to perceived value; perceived value positively related to satisfaction, continuance intention, and purchase intention. Satisfaction and continuance intention did not significantly predict purchase intention. Content and users' emotional responses were important to use and subscription decisions. For a founder, use this as a question to test in your own context, not a universal playbook.
Learn more →
Buyer behavior
Study strength: 3.5/5
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · 2023
For your marketing
Treat this as evidence for the specific customer behavior and adoption question studied. Compare the setting and sample to your company before changing a growth decision; use a local experiment where the paper does not match your context.
Summary
Access-based journeys are systemic, tightly coupled and vulnerable to circularity failures; customers act as prosumers and bypass, stretch or hack platform policies to personalize journeys. Job crafting can create individual value and collective problems, but can also reveal innovations that platforms may formalize. Managers therefore need agility and monitoring rather than assuming a fully controllable linear journey. For a founder, use this as a question to test in your own context, not a universal playbook.
Learn more →
AIBuyer behaviorSales
Study strength: 2.5/5
Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing · 2026
For your marketing
Treat this as evidence for the specific b2b growth and sales question studied. Compare the setting and sample to your company before changing a growth decision; use a local experiment where the paper does not match your context.
Summary
Buyer engagement depends on supplier-selection criteria, buyer role/readiness and project-specific factors; positive prior attitudes, perceived value and willingness predict co-creation intention. For a founder, use this as a question to test in your own context, not a universal playbook.
Learn more →
Buyer behavior
Study strength: 3/5
Sustainable Futures · 2025
For your marketing
Treat this as evidence for the specific customer behavior and adoption question studied. Compare the setting and sample to your company before changing a growth decision; use a local experiment where the paper does not match your context.
Summary
Emerging-technology integration was positively related to organizational, process and product/service innovation across both continents; African enterprises showed stronger process-innovation adaptability despite infrastructure limits; gender differences affected product/service-innovation perceptions. For a founder, use this as a question to test in your own context, not a universal playbook.
Learn more →
Buyer behavior
Study strength: 4.0/5
Journal of Retailing, 91(4), 679-700 · 2015
For your marketing
Use as a measurement/design checklist for onboarding and support, then validate which service-quality dimensions predict SaaS activation, expansion, and renewal in your segment.
Summary
E-service-quality dimensions have meaningful relationships with customer evaluations and behavioral outcomes, but effects depend on measurement and context. Founder-use interpretation: Use as a measurement/design checklist for onboarding and support, then validate which service-quality dimensions predict SaaS activation, expansion, and renewal in your segment.
Learn more →
Buyer behaviorDeveloper experience
Study strength: 3.5/5
Information Systems Research · 2006
For your marketing
Use this as a question to test in your own product context, not as a universal benchmark. The publisher abstract does not provide an explicit limitations section or a causal identification strategy. Because the evidence is observational and tied to Freshmeat.net/project-home-page listings, representativeness and causal interpretation beyond those projects remain uncertain.
Summary
License restrictiveness and organizational sponsorship interacted: users were most attracted to projects sponsored by nonmarket organizations and using nonrestrictive licenses. Licensing and sponsorship also addressed complementary developer motivations, so licensing’s relationship with development activity depended on sponsor type. Founder-use interpretation: Use this as a question to test in your own product context, not as a universal benchmark. The publisher abstract does not provide an explicit limitations section or a causal identification strategy. Because the evidence is observational and tied to Freshmeat.net/project-home-page listings, representativeness and causal interpretation beyond those projects remain uncertain.
Learn more →
AIBuyer behavior
Study strength: 3.5/5
Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing · 2024
For your marketing
Provide machine-readable evidence, governance, and cross-functional consensus support in procurement workflows.
Summary
AI adoption is expected to increase reliance on AI-generated input, reduce organizational buying-center size, and increase coordination while reducing conflict.
Learn more →
Buyer behavior
Study strength: 3.5/5
Journal of Service Research · 2024
For your marketing
Measure functional, economic, emotional, and social value separately in pricing and positioning research.
Summary
Perceived value is multidimensional and consistently related to important customer outcomes, with effects depending on context and value dimensions.
Learn more →
Buyer behavior
Study strength: 3.5/5
Technological Forecasting and Social Change · 2024
For your marketing
Treat scale-up as capability/process redesign: define priorities, surface trade-offs and deliberately build dynamic capabilities.
Summary
Scaling combines internal activities, priorities and trade-offs; four priorities/tensions emerge, and dynamic capabilities help balance them.
Learn more →
Buyer behavior
Study strength: 3.5/5
Heliyon · 2024
For your marketing
Invest in data capabilities and agile operating routines together; technology alone is unlikely to deliver innovation gains.
Summary
Digital transformation improved innovation performance through big-data capabilities and organizational agility.
Learn more →
Buyer behavior
Study strength: 3.5/5
Technology in Society · 2024
For your marketing
Balance discovery with disciplined exploitation; prioritize operational digital capability and resource collaboration when scaling a SaaS model.
Summary
Exploratory and exploitative learning both predicted business-model innovation; exploitative learning was stronger, with digital sensing, operations and resource collaboration partially mediating.
Learn more →
Buyer behaviorFree trialsPricing
Study strength: 3.5/5
International Journal of Information Management · 2024
For your marketing
Match monetization to value type: feature gating for functional value, virtual goods where hedonic/social value dominates.
Summary
Functional, hedonic, social, and price value in the free version predicted willingness to pay; effects differed between limited-feature and virtual-item monetization.
Learn more →
Buyer behavior
Study strength: 3.5/5
Information Systems Research · 2023
For your marketing
Test earlier account creation carefully; measure long-run monetization rather than only immediate signup conversion.
Summary
Requesting registration before shopping raised registration probability 58.08% relatively and increased long-run purchases, orders, and revenue, without changing short-run conversion.
Learn more →
Buyer behaviorCloud computingProduct adoption
Study strength: 3.5/5
Technology in Society · 2023
For your marketing
Address status-quo inertia and loss aversion explicitly in cloud sales, migration and change plans.
Summary
Inertia affects non-adopters; adopters emphasize benefits; non-adopters are more influenced by loss aversion; prior adopters did not consider risks as expected.
Learn more →
Buyer behavior
Study strength: 4/5
Journal of Business Research · 2023
For your marketing
Use the review’s themes to audit digital venture design: platform/ecosystem position, technology-enabled value creation, resource constraints, and the capabilities needed to turn digital activity into a business model.
Summary
Identifies themes, contexts, methods, and gaps in digital entrepreneurship research; digital technologies affect venture formation and business models while resource and know-how constraints remain important for smaller firms.
Learn more →
Buyer behavior
Study strength: 3.5/5
Decision Support Systems · 2023
For your marketing
Use IT to make external collaboration executable, then measure product/process outcomes from open innovation.
Summary
IT resource investment enabled open-innovation initiatives, which improved open product and process innovation performance.
Learn more →
Buyer behavior
Study strength: 3.5/5
ICSE Proceedings · 2022
For your marketing
Ask teams what blocks productive work and use those responses to prioritize tooling and process improvements.
Summary
Explores how productivity is perceived within software teams and what contextual factors shape those perceptions.
Learn more →
Buyer behavior
Study strength: 3.5/5
Industrial Marketing Management · 2022
For your marketing
Build expertise-led content that supports buyer education and sales conversations.
Summary
Synthesizes thought-leadership knowledge and transfers relevant B2C insights to B2B marketing and sales.
Learn more →
Buyer behavior
Study strength: 3.5/5
Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management, and Innovation · 2022
For your marketing
Instrument customer discovery and experimentation as explicit organizational learning, while benchmarking competitors and recruiting complementary team skills.
Summary
Start-ups used customers, benchmarking, prior experience, competitors, consultants, internal ideas and educational content; teams and active experimentation were dominant learning mechanisms.
Learn more →
Buyer behaviorFree trialsPricing
Study strength: 3.5/5
Journal of Business Research · 2022
For your marketing
Segment pricing presentation: deal-oriented users may respond differently to free versus paid framing.
Summary
Individual differences in need for closure and deal proneness shape preference for freemium versus premium price choices.
Learn more →
Buyer behavior
Study strength: 3.5/5
Journal of the Knowledge Economy · 2022
For your marketing
Pair IT investment with customer/market learning routines, not just internal knowledge reuse.
Summary
IT capability had a significant association with innovation performance; exploratory learning mainly mediated the relationship while enabling exploitation of existing knowledge.
Learn more →
Buyer behavior
Study strength: 3.5/5
Software · 2022
For your marketing
Use the map to build a balanced measurement model rather than adopting a single productivity proxy.
Summary
Maps how software productivity is defined, measured, and studied in practice.
Learn more →
Buyer behavior
Study strength: 3.5/5
Industrial Marketing Management · 2022
For your marketing
Diagnose capability, culture, and customer barriers before prescribing a channel or tool.
Summary
Internal and external factors both enable and constrain digital-marketing practice; one-size-fits-all approaches are inappropriate.
Learn more →
Buyer behavior
Study strength: 3.5/5
Information Systems Frontiers · 2020
For your marketing
Audit whether the team has the people, technical base and innovation routines needed for both product and process digitalization.
Summary
Human, technical and innovation capabilities contributed to digital market offerings; human, collaboration and technical capabilities contributed to digital business processes.
Learn more →
Buyer behavior
Study strength: 3.5/5
Telecommunications Policy · 2019
For your marketing
Connect digital feature work to explicit business-model changes and performance metrics, not adoption counts alone.
Summary
Business-model innovation practices were examined as mechanisms through which digitalizing SMEs can improve performance.
Learn more →
Buyer behavior
Study strength: 3.5/5
European Journal of Innovation Management · 2019
For your marketing
Measure whether the firm can absorb partner knowledge when evaluating platform/API and collaboration investments.
Summary
IT capability directly affected open-innovation performance and also indirectly through absorptive capacity.
Learn more →
Buyer behavior
Study strength: 3.5/5
Industrial Marketing Management · 2019
For your marketing
Link positioning choices to systematic customer intelligence and competitive response.
Summary
Examines links among market orientation, positioning strategy, and brand performance.
Learn more →
Buyer behavior
Study strength: 3.5/5
Empirical Software Engineering · 2018
For your marketing
Adapt release controls to company maturity; do not copy enterprise or startup practices without context.
Summary
Compares release-engineering practices across organizational scale and maturity.
Learn more →
Buyer behavior
Study strength: 3.5/5
Information Systems Journal · 2018
For your marketing
Diagnose transformation as a bundle of entrepreneurial capabilities and resource choices rather than a software purchase.
Summary
The capability perspective explains how SME entrepreneurs undertake digital transformation under resource constraints.
Learn more →
Buyer behavior
Study strength: 3.5/5
Empirical Software Engineering · 2016
For your marketing
Pilot TDD with explicit quality and productivity measures rather than assuming tests automatically accelerate delivery.
Summary
Tests the effects of TDD on external quality and productivity in an industrial setting.
Learn more →
Buyer behaviorDeveloper experiencePlatforms
Study strength: 3.5/5
2016 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) · 2016
For your marketing
Use the study’s platform, complementor, API, ecosystem, open-source, or standards implications to guide governance, partner incentives, integration priorities, and ecosystem experimentation; validate in the founder’s market.
Summary
The fetched metadata identifies this peer-reviewed work as addressing mobile application developers' platform choice model. Detailed findings were not exposed in the fetched abstract.
Learn more →
Buyer behavior
Study strength: 3.5/5
Journal of Marketing · 2016
For your marketing
Map the SaaS journey end to end, assign ownership across marketing/product/support, and measure friction between stages.
Summary
Customer experience is cumulative across pre-purchase, purchase, and post-purchase touchpoints, including customer and partner interactions.
Learn more →
Buyer behavior
Study strength: 3.5/5
Research Policy · 2003
For your marketing
Use the study’s platform, complementor, API, ecosystem, open-source, or standards implications to guide governance, partner incentives, integration priorities, and ecosystem experimentation; validate in the founder’s market.
Summary
The fetched metadata identifies this peer-reviewed work as addressing satisfying heterogeneous user needs via innovation toolkits: the case of apache security software. Detailed findings were not exposed in the fetched abstract.
Learn more →
Buyer behavior
Study strength: 3.5/5
Journal of Business Research · 2002
For your marketing
Track delivered performance directly instead of relying only on expectation gaps; use this in product and support instrumentation.
Summary
Replicates support for performance-only service-quality measurement (SERVPERF) and model service quality as an antecedent of satisfaction.
Learn more →
Buyer behavior
Study strength: 3.5/5
Journal of Environmental Economics and Management · 2002
For your marketing
Use the study’s platform, complementor, API, ecosystem, open-source, or standards implications to guide governance, partner incentives, integration priorities, and ecosystem experimentation; validate in the founder’s market.
Summary
The fetched metadata identifies this peer-reviewed work as addressing permits, standards, and technology innovation. Detailed findings were not exposed in the fetched abstract.
Learn more →
Buyer behaviorRetention
Study strength: 4/5
Journal of Retailing · 2000
For your marketing
Measure perceived value and quality separately from satisfaction; improve the complete service experience to support expansion intent.
Summary
Quality, value, and satisfaction each relate directly to behavioral intentions; indirect effects also matter.
Learn more →
Buyer behavior
Study strength: 3.5/5
Journal of Marketing · 1995
For your marketing
Translate reliability and support improvements into retention and lifetime-value scenarios before prioritizing roadmap work.
Summary
Quality improvements can be evaluated through their effects on retention, usage, and customer economics rather than satisfaction alone.
Learn more →
Buyer behavior
Study strength: 3.5/5
Decision Support Systems · 2008
For your marketing
Make security, reliability, policies, and third-party proof visible at high-risk conversion points.
Summary
Trust and perceived risk jointly shape purchase intention; signals about vendor trustworthiness can reduce uncertainty.
Learn more →
Buyer behaviorProduct adoption
Study strength: 3.5/5
Decision Sciences · 1995
For your marketing
Understand who controls standards, integration, and switching before choosing sales channels or ecosystem strategy.
Summary
Interorganizational power and organizational factors help explain adoption choices and governance of EDI relationships.
Learn more →
Buyer behavior
Study strength: 4/5
Technological Forecasting and Social Change · 2023
For your marketing
Use the themes to frame platform, data, services and recurring-value strategy.
Summary
Four themes dominate: aligning digitalization and servitization, value co-creation, platform strategy, and business-model innovation.
Learn more →
Buyer behaviorSales
Study strength: 3.5/5
Journal of Operations Management · 2015
For your marketing
Balance partnership depth with governance, independent measurement and exit options.
Summary
Social capital has an inverted-curvilinear relationship with performance: too little or too much can hurt objectivity and enable opportunism.
Learn more →
AIBuyer behavior
Study strength: 3.5/5
Journal of Decision Systems · 2023
For your marketing
Segment explanations and onboarding by user expertise; assess calibration.
Summary
Expertise changes trust and willingness to follow XAI; explanations do not have uniform effects.
Learn more →
Buyer behaviorCloud computing
Study strength: 3.5/5
” Journal of Systems and Software · 2015
For your marketing
Make security/privacy/portability concrete in enterprise sales and architecture; avoid over-investing in availability/integration messaging as the primary adoption blocker.
Summary
Security, data privacy, and portability were adoption inhibitors; security concern increased non-adoption likelihood up to 26-fold, while availability, integration, and migration complexity were not likely to hold back adoption.
Learn more →
Buyer behavior
Study strength: 3.5/5
Journal of the Brazilian Computer Society · 2018
For your marketing
Sets realistic expectations for open-sourcing a product: external volume can be substantial, but employees may need to staff core maintenance, review, integration, and community stewardship.
Summary
Internal developers made 43.3% of pull requests and external developers 56.7%; employees still held central roles despite external support. Most external developers were casual single-contribution participants, while some external members handled core activities such as triage, review, and integration.
Learn more →
Buyer behavior
Study strength: 3.5/5
Industrial Marketing Management · 2015
For your marketing
Shows how customer-facing value communication across a customer's value chain can support premium pricing for developer tools and industrial data products.
Summary
Comprehensive multi-stage marketing significantly increased purchasing agents' willingness to pay, mainly through relationship-value perceptions, especially when the customer was less powerful toward its own customers.
Learn more →
Buyer behavior
Study strength: 3.5/5
Long Range Planning · 2019
For your marketing
Build sensing, rapid experimentation, portfolio choices, and transformation routines into the company-s operating model rather than treating digital transformation as a one-off project.
Summary
The process model identifies nine microfoundations; digital sensing, seizing, and transforming capabilities support ongoing transformation, with agility central to renewal of business model, collaboration, and culture.
Learn more →