Skip to content
J·BJon BishopIndependent growth marketer

Pricing · Pricing field experiment and utility-based retention model

The Impact of Tariff Structure on Customer Retention, Usage, and Profitability of Access Services

Marketing Science · 2011

Raghuram Iyengar, Kamel Jedidi, Skander Essegaier, Peter J. Danaher

Summary

Compared with pay-per-use pricing, the two-part tariff reduced annual retention by an average 10.5% and yearly usage by 38.7%, after controlling for income effects.

For your marketing

Possible founder application

Evaluate the behavioral effects of access fees separately from per-use prices. A plan can reduce usage and retention yet still improve profit, so test the full customer and margin outcomes.

Reported result

What the study found

Compared with pay-per-use pricing, the two-part tariff reduced annual retention by an average 10.5% and yearly usage by 38.7%, after controlling for income effects. Despite these declines, the two-part tariff remained profit-maximizing in the studied setting. Ignoring the tariff-structure effect reduced modeled firm profit by 11%.

Research question

What the authors investigated

How do pay-per-use and two-part-tariff pricing affect service retention, usage and profit?

Design

A utility-based model is estimated with data from a pricing field experiment for a new telecommunications access service.

Sample and setting

Customers of one new telecommunications service in a market experiment; the abstract reports model-based average effects across the experimental tariff conditions.

Scope and transfer

Limitations to keep in view

A single telecommunications service and historical market experiment. The profitability result depends on the study's demand, cost and pricing assumptions and should not be treated as a SaaS pricing benchmark.

Research sources

INFORMS publisher abstract; the experiment setting, tariff comparison and reported percentages are stated there.

Prefer to write? Send Jon a message.