Skip to content
J·BJon BishopIndependent growth marketer

Pricing and monetization · Laboratory experiment in which sellers set a base/headline price and a later drip price; buyers initially saw only the base price and then encountered the additional price, allowing comparison of transparency/regulatory conditions and buyer decisions.

Drip Pricing and Its Regulation: Experimental Evidence

Renée B. B. M. van den Berg, Maarten C. W. Janssen (2021). Drip Pricing and Its Regulation: Experimental Evidence. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2020.10.023

Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · 2021DOI: 10.1016/j.jebo.2020.10.023 ↗

Plain-English take

The experiment tests whether drip pricing changes buyer behavior and seller pricing relative to more transparent presentation; it provides causal evidence on the behavioral and regulatory consequences of separating headline and add-on prices.

How much weight to give this

3/5 Empirical evidence with design limits

The 1–5 evidence-check score is a practical reading aid, not a formal peer review or a probability that a conclusion is true. It combines design strength (2 points), sample reporting (1), comparison/control clarity (1), and how much of the paper could be checked (1). Access affects how confidently this directory can assess a study, not the study's underlying quality. Blinding is reported separately because it is not relevant to every design.

Design · 1/2

Laboratory experiment in which sellers set a base/headline price and a later drip price; buyers initially saw only the base price and then encountered the additional price, allowing comparison of transparency/regulatory conditions and buyer decisions.

Sample · 0.5/1

Experimental buyers and sellers in a controlled pricing market; the publisher abstract describes the two-price seller treatment and buyers' tentative decisions, but the accessible page does not report the participant count.

Comparison · 0.5/1

Check comparison conditions and analysis in the paper.

Can we check it? · 0/1

Publisher record checked; full-text methods were not verified.

Double-blind? Blinding details were not established from the checked publisher page.

Research question

What the authors investigated

What does drip pricing and its regulation: experimental evidence show about customer behavior or marketing outcomes?

Design

Laboratory experiment in which sellers set a base/headline price and a later drip price; buyers initially saw only the base price and then encountered the additional price, allowing comparison of transparency/regulatory conditions and buyer decisions.

Sample and setting

Experimental buyers and sellers in a controlled pricing market; the publisher abstract describes the two-price seller treatment and buyers' tentative decisions, but the accessible page does not report the participant count.

Reported result

What the study found

The experiment tests whether drip pricing changes buyer behavior and seller pricing relative to more transparent presentation; it provides causal evidence on the behavioral and regulatory consequences of separating headline and add-on prices.

This is a paraphrase of the source. Check the original paper for definitions, estimates, statistical uncertainty and analysis details.

Scope and transfer

Limitations to keep in view

Inference from the laboratory design: induced two-stage prices and buyer/seller roles may not capture all information, search, and enforcement conditions in real markets; external validity is therefore not established by the experiment alone. Full-text methods and correction history were not independently checked.

Possible founder application

Use this paper as evidence about drip pricing and its regulation: experimental evidence in the stated context; compare its population, treatment and outcome with your own decision.

Evidence access

Publisher page; full-text availability varies and was not established.

Candidate study metadata and reported evidence were cross-checked against a direct publisher-page retrieval; the full article was not independently reviewed.

If only an abstract or metadata was available, the profile is limited to claims supported there. A paper's paywall does not change its evidentiary status, but it limits what we can substantiate from accessible text.

Prefer to write? Send Jon a message.